The
"local" TV news broadcast opens with "tonight's stories .
. .".
What stories are being told?
Who is telling the stories? Is there any real "local"
media left? Who owns it? Who controls it?
Stories are one of the most
basic means that information about communities is
communicated within itself. Stories that tell the
community's history, its commonly held ethical and moral
beliefs, and the current events that are both personal
and civic. For a democracy to function for the benefit of
the many, a sharing of information is critical. To this
end we need a media that is not a cheerleader for
capitalist consumerism and the servant of the elite
wealth-based power structure. We need some media
components that are noncommercial and nonprofit--media
that can support the need for people to communicate their
stories, politics and values within their community. This
is not what we have today.
The media coverage of the WTO
is an example of how the corporate media reports on
sensationalism, not on analysis that would be useful for
citizens in a true democracy -- a democracy ruled by the
many, not the few wealthy power elites.
What is a functioning
democracy? Is the United States one? Are you
participating in one at the local governmental level?
These are questions that need asking and answering in
today's world. A world where the majority of media is
controled by a few very large multinational corporations.
The Internet was seen as a new
avenue for citizens to have access to media and be
producers of media, but this is rapidly diminishing with
mergers like the recent one between AOL and Time Warner.
"This is the last nail in the coffin for anyone who
believed that the Internet is the last stronghold of
media competition", says Robert McChesney, a professor of
Communication at the University of Illinois and author of
Rich Media, Poor Democracy.
We need a political challenge
to the control of media by large multinational
corporations. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 passed
by Congress was a disgrace to the citizens of this
country. It was a multi-billion dollar give away of
public media resources with nothing in return and it
removed the constraints on monopoly ownership in large
media markets. The revision of this act needs to be on
the agenda of the progressive political movements in this
country. Has anyone heard Bush or Gore, the accepted
corporate appointees, mention media issues? Don't hold
your breath.
If you want some background on
this issue, a good place to start is by reading Robert
McChesney's book, Rich Media, Poor Democracy. Buy it from
your local bookstore. You can read comments
here.
Rich Media, Poor
Democracy
by Robert McChesney
University of Illinois Press
Urbana and Chicago
1999, 427 pgs.
ISBN 0-252-02448-6
Buy the book from University of Illinois Press
http://www.press.uillinois.edu/f99/mcchesney.html